Cognitive Conflicts and the Making of International Law: From Empirical Concord to Conceptual Discor
It has long been claimed that international lawmaking has grown pluralized in the sense that it has allegedly moved away from the traditional Westphalian and state-centric model of lawmaking. New processes outside traditional diplomatic channels and involving non-state actors are said to qualify as lawmaking, and the products thereof have come to be ascertainable as genuine legal rules. Such an assertion of a pluralization of international lawmaking is now common, and those